Test PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions Fee | ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Guide Materials

DOWNLOAD the newest TrainingDump ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vWf8s9rLVOKdb9vFss15FYyt7vKcMaWE

Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study prep has a pass rate of 98% to 100% because of the high test hit rate. So our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study materials are not only effective but also useful. As we all know, time is very important to everyone. Some candidates are very busy with their own work and families. It is very difficult to take time out to review the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam. But if you use ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam materials, you will learn very little time and have a high pass rate. Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study materials are worthy of your trust.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification is designed for professionals who have already gained experience in the field of information security, and who are looking to further their knowledge and skills. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is ideal for auditors, consultants, and managers who want to demonstrate their expertise in information security management, and who want to be recognized as leaders in their field.

>> Test PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions Fee <<

Hot Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions Fee | Pass-Sure PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Guide Materials: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam

You can also trust PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam questions and start PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam preparation. With the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor valid dumps you can get an idea about the format of real PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions. These latest PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor questions will help you pass the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam.

To prepare for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam, candidates are recommended to attend a training course provided by PECB or one of its accredited training partners. They can also use study materials such as books, online courses, and practice exams to enhance their knowledge and skills. After passing the certification exam, candidates will be awarded the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor certificate, which is valid for three years and can be renewed through continuing education and professional development activities.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q249-Q254):

NEW QUESTION # 249
Which of the following is an information security management system standard published by the International Organization for Standardization?

A. ISO5501
B. ISO9008
C. ISO22301
D. ISO27001

Answer: D

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is an information security management system standard published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). It specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system within the context of the organization. It also includes requirements for the assessment and treatment of information security risks tailored to the needs of the organization. The standard is intended to be applicable to all organizations, regardless of type, size or nature. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is part of the ISO/IEC 27000 family of standards, which provide a comprehensive framework for information security management. Reference: [CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course], ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO/IEC 27000 family - Information security management systems

NEW QUESTION # 250
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to verify the information security incident management process. The IT Security Manager presents the information security incident management procedure (Document reference ID:
ISMS_L2_16, version 4).
You review the document and notice a statement "Any information security weakness, event, and incident should be reported to the Point of Contact (PoC) within 1 hour after identification". When interviewing staff, you found that there were differences in the understanding of the meaning of the phrase "weakness, event, and incident".
The IT Security Manager explained that an online "information security handling" training seminar was conducted 6 months ago. All the people interviewed participated in and passed the reporting exercise and course assessment.
You would like to investigate other areas further to collect more audit evidence. Select three options that would not be valid audit trails.

A. Collect more evidence on how information security incidents are reported via appropriate channels (relevant to control A.6.8)
B. Collect more evidence on how the organisation tests the business continuity plan. (Relevant to control A.5.30)
C. Collect more evidence to determine if ISO 27035 (Information security incident management) is used as internal audit criteria. (Relevant to clause 8.13)
D. Collect more evidence on how the organisation manages the Point of Contact (PoC) which monitors vulnerabilities. (Relevant to clause 8.1)
E. Collect more evidence on how the organisation conducts information security incident training and evaluates its effectiveness. (Relevant to clause 7.2)
F. Collect more evidence on how the organisation learns from information security incidents and makes improvements. (Relevant to control A.5.27)
G. Collect more evidence on how areas subject to information security incidents are quarantined to maintain information security during disruption (relevant to control A.5.29)
H. Collect more evidence on whether terms and definitions are contained in the information security policy.(Relevant to control 5.32)

Answer: C,D,H

Explanation:
Explanation
The three options that would not be valid audit trails are:
*Collect more evidence on how the organisation manages the Point of Contact (PoC) which monitors vulnerabilities. (Relevant to clause 8.1)
*Collect more evidence on whether terms and definitions are contained in the information security policy.
(Relevant to control 5.32)
*Collect more evidence to determine if ISO 27035 (Information security incident management) is used as internal audit criteria. (Relevant to clause 8.13) These options are not valid audit trails because they are not directly related to the information security incident management process, which is the focus of the audit. The audit trails should be relevant to the objectives, scope, and criteria of the audit, and should provide sufficient and reliable evidence to support the audit findings and conclusions1.
Option E is not valid because the PoC is not a part of the information security incident management process, but rather a role that is responsible for reporting and escalating information security incidents to the appropriate authorities2. The audit trail should focus on how the PoC performs this function, not how the organisation manages the PoC.
Option G is not valid because the terms and definitions are not a part of the information security incident management process, but rather a part of the information security policy, which is a high-level document that defines the organisation's information security objectives, principles, and responsibilities3. The audit trail should focus on how the information security policy is communicated, implemented, and reviewed, not whether it contains terms and definitions.
Option H is not valid because ISO 27035 is not a part of the information security incident management process, but rather a guidance document that provides best practices for managing information security incidents4. The audit trail should focus on how the organisation follows the requirements of ISO/IEC
27001:2022 for information security incident management, not whether it uses ISO 27035 as an internal audit criteria.
The other options are valid audit trails because they are related to the information security incident management process, and they can provide useful evidence to evaluate the conformity and effectiveness of the process. For example:
*Option A is valid because it relates to control A.5.29, which requires the organisation to establish procedures to isolate and quarantine areas subject to information security incidents, in order to prevent further damage and preserve evidence5. The audit trail should collect evidence on how the organisation implements and tests these procedures, and how they ensure the continuity of information security during disruption.
*Option B is valid because it relates to control A.6.8, which requires the organisation to establish mechanisms for reporting information security events and weaknesses, and to ensure that they are communicated in a timely manner to the appropriate levels within the organisation6. The audit trail should collect evidence on how the organisation defines and uses these mechanisms, and how they monitor and review the reporting process.
*Option C is valid because it relates to clause 7.2, which requires the organisation to provide information security awareness, education, and training to all persons under its control, and to evaluate the effectiveness of these activities7. The audit trail should collect evidence on how the organisation identifies the information security training needs, how they deliver and record the training, and how they measure the learning outcomes and feedback.
*Option D is valid because it relates to control A.5.27, which requires the organisation to learn from information security incidents and to implement corrective actions to prevent recurrence or reduce impact8.
The audit trail should collect evidence on how the organisation analyses and documents the root causes and consequences of information security incidents, how they identify and implement corrective actions, and how they verify the effectiveness of these actions.
*Option F is valid because it relates to control A.5.30, which requires the organisation to establish and maintain a business continuity plan to ensure the availability of information and information processing facilities in the event of a severe information security incident9. The audit trail should collect evidence on how the organisation develops and updates the business continuity plan, how they test and review the plan, and how they communicate and train the relevant personnel on the plan.
References: 1: ISO 19011:2018, 6.2; 2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.6.8.1; 3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 5.2; 4:
ISO/IEC 27035:2016, Introduction; 5: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.5.29; 6: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.6.8; 7:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 7.2; 8: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.5.27; 9: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.5.30; : ISO
19011:2018; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27035:2016; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; :
ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022

NEW QUESTION # 251
Which department maintain's contacts with law enforcement authorities, regulatory bodies, information service providers and telecommunications service providers depending on the service required.

A. CISO
B. COO
C. CSM
D. MRO

Answer: A

Explanation:
The department that maintains contacts with law enforcement authorities, regulatory bodies, information service providers and telecommunications service providers depending on the service required is CISO. CISO stands for Chief Information Security Officer. A CISO is a senior-level executive who is responsible for overseeing the information security strategy and governance of an organization. A CISO also leads the information security function and coordinates with other departments and stakeholders to ensure compliance with laws, regulations and standards related to information security. A CISO may also act as a liaison between the organization and external parties, such as law enforcement authorities or service providers, in case of incidents or investigations involving information security issues. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requires the organization to assign top management roles and responsibilities for ensuring that information security objectives are established and achieved (see clause 5.3). Reference: CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is CISO?

NEW QUESTION # 252
During a Stage 1 audit opening meeting, the Management System Representative (MSR) asks to extend the audit scope to include a new site overseas which they have expanded into since the certification application was made.
Select two options for how the auditor should respond.

A. Confirm that the auditor will advise the auditee that the audit scope will be revised to include the new work area
B. Advise the MSR that, within the existing scope, the new work area can be included without any problem
C. Advise the MSR that an extension of the scope may be incorporated but will have to go through established procedures
D. Advise the MSR that the audit scope has been determined based on their initial application so the audit has to proceed as planned
E. Determine whether the Management System covers the processes at the new site and, if so, proceed with the audit
F. Suggest that the MSR cancels the audit contract and reapplies for the new situation

Answer: C,E

Explanation:
The correct options for how the auditor should respond are:
* A. Advise the MSR that an extension of the scope may be incorporated but will have to go through established procedures
* D. Determine whether the Management System covers the processes at the new site and, if so, proceed with the audit These options are consistent with the ISO/IEC 27006:2015 standard, which states that any changes to the scope of certification should be notified by the client to the certification body, and that the certification body should evaluate and decide on these changes in accordance with its procedures1. The auditor should also verify that the ISMS is implemented and maintained at all sites included in the scope of certification1.
The other options are not appropriate for how the auditor should respond, because:
* B. Advise the MSR that the audit scope has been determined based on their initial application so the audit has to proceed as planned: This option is too rigid and does not allow for any flexibility or adaptation to the client's situation. The auditor should be open to consider any changes to the scope of certification that may have occurred since the initial application, as long as they are properly notified and evaluated by the certification body.
* C. Suggest that the MSR cancels the audit contract and reapplies for the new situation: This option is too drastic and unnecessary, as it would cause delays and costs for both the client and the certification body. The auditor should not suggest that the client cancels the audit contract, but rather that they follow the established procedures for requesting and approving an extension of the scope of certification.
* E. Advise the MSR that, within the existing scope, the new work area can be included without any problem: This option is too lenient and does not ensure that the new work area meets the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001 and the ISMS. The auditor should not assume that the new work area can be included within the existing scope without any problem, but rather that they need to verify that the ISMS is implemented and maintained at the new site, and that any changes to the scope of certification are approved by the certification body.
* F. Confirm that the auditor will advise the auditee that the audit scope will be revised to include the new work area: This option is too presumptuous and does not respect the authority of the certification body.
The auditor should not confirm that they will revise the audit scope to include the new work area, but rather that they will advise the certification body of the client's request for an extension of the scope of certification, and wait for their decision.

NEW QUESTION # 253
You are the audit team leader conducting a third-party audit of an online insurance organisation. During Stage
1, you found that the organisation took a very cautious risk approach and included all the information security controls in ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Appendix A in their Statement of Applicability.
During the Stage 2 audit, your audit team found that there was no evidence of the implementation of the three controls (5.3 Segregation of duties, 6.1 Screening, 7.12 Cabling security) shown in the extract from the Statement of Applicability. No risk treatment plan was found.

Select three options for the actions you would expect the auditee to take in response to a nonconformity against clause 6.1.3.e of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.

A. Undertake a survey of customers to find out if the controls are needed by them.
B. Allocate responsibility for producing evidence to prove to auditors that the controls are implemented.
C. Remove the three controls from the Statement of Applicability.
D. Compile plans for the periodic assessment of the risks associated with the controls.
E. Implement the appropriate risk treatment for each of the applicable controls.
F. Revisit the risk assessment process relating to the three controls.
G. Incorporate written procedures for the controls into the organisation's Security Manual.
H. Revise the relevant content in the Statement of Applicability to justify their exclusion.

Answer: E,F,H

Explanation:
According to the PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, the auditee should take the following actions in response to a nonconformity against clause 6.1.3.e of ISO/IEC 27001:20221:
* Implement the appropriate risk treatment for each of the applicable controls, as this is the main requirement of clause 6.1.3.e and the objective of the risk treatment process2.
* Revise the relevant content in the Statement of Applicability to justify their exclusion, as this is the expected output of the risk treatment process and the evidence of the risk-based decisions3.
* Revisit the risk assessment process relating to the three controls, as this is the input for the risk treatment process and the source of identifying the risks and the controls4.
The other options are not correct because:
* Allocating responsibility for producing evidence to prove to auditors that the controls are implemented is not a valid action, as the audit team already found that there was no evidence of the implementation of the three controls.
* Compiling plans for the periodic assessment of the risks associated with the controls is not a valid action, as this is part of the risk monitoring and review process, not the risk treatment process5.
* Incorporating written procedures for the controls into the organisation's Security Manual is not a valid action, as this is part of the documentation and operation of the ISMS, not the risk treatment process.
* Removing the three controls from the Statement of Applicability is not a valid action, as this is not a sufficient justification for their exclusion and does not reflect the risk treatment process.
* Undertaking a survey of customers to find out if the controls are needed by them is not a valid action, as this is not a relevant criterion for the risk assessment and treatment process, which should be based on the organisation's own context and objectives.
References: 1: PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 36, section 4.5.22: ISO
/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3.e3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3.f4: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.25:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.2. : ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 7.5 and 8. : ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause
6.1.3.d. : ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 4.1 and 4.2.

NEW QUESTION # 254
......

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Guide Materials: https://www.trainingdump.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-practice-exam-dumps.html

BONUS!!! Download part of TrainingDump ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vWf8s9rLVOKdb9vFss15FYyt7vKcMaWE